“Stay Strong” Immune Boosting Seminar
with Ricardo Boye N.D.
November 10,2011 5:30 pm -7:00 pm
YOU are YOUR first line of defense in fighting the cold and flu. This seminar is designed to give you the tools, through tips and strategies, to naturally boost the immune system and conquer the 2011-2012 cold
and flu season. We will unveil our new Immune-Boosting packages and treatments at this event and give the attendees the first opportunity to book these customized Immune-Boosting specials!!
Topics to be discussed:
And many more interesting
topics!!!!!
Reserve your spot today as space is limited!!!!!!
Where: The Spa on Green Street
When: November 10, 2011
Time: 5:30 PM – 7:00 PM
Cost: $10.00 to reserve your spot, which will then be applied as a Spa
credit for use on the day of event.
Hi there folks — listen to part II of ‘How Food Companies Trick You into Thinking their Junk Food is Healthy’. You don’t want to miss these highly deceiving tactics employed by the big food giants to falsely market their products as healthy when in reality they are far from it. This is actually from a post written by Dr. Yoni Freedhoff, MD who is a ‘nutritional watchdog’ of sorts because of his advocacy efforts for improved public policies regarding nutrition and obesity. He is the founder and Medical Director of the Bariatric Medical Institute in Ottawa, dedicated to the (nonsurgical) treatment of overweight and obesity since 2004. If you missed part I, scroll back a few posts and you will find it there.
Also, I talk about a recent report released by the nonprofit group Environmental Working Group where they discuss the hazards of pesticides in our foods, and their ‘dirty dozen’ list of most heavily sprayed crops as well as the ‘clean fifteen’ list of least sprayed crops.
Furthermore, I discuss the conundrum about sunshine — we are told to stay out of it and we are also told we need it. What gives? Learn about:
This and much much more on this edition of Embracing Health —- enjoy!
(Click here to listen =>) “How Food Companies Trick You into thinking Junk Food is Healthy part II; Chemicals in our Food: Learn Which Foods Contain the Most Pesticides and Also the Least; All About the Sun – Healthy or Harmful?”
A recent study published on June 20th in the medical journal Pediatrics reveals that food allergies in children are a serious issue and they demand further attention. It is the largest study to date that has tracked childhood food allergies in the U.S. and shows that they may be more common and more dangerous than previously recognized. This is a growing problem here and I’d like to share an important perspective with you that I feel deserves great care and attention.
I’ve been talking about both food allergies and food sensitivities for some time now, and it is a main component of my clinical practice in helping people to improve their health. Allergies and sensitivites are quite different, but they both involve exaggerated reactions of your body that contribute to whole list of symptoms and chronic diseases. The immune system is a very dynamic and complex system, and one of its main characteristics is inflammation — that’s how your body fights disease and initiates repair. However, chronic stimulation of the immune system leads to chronic inflammation, and that leads to prolonged damage to your body that never gets a chance to heal. You basically are worn down by all the damage being done by your own immune system. That’s what autoimmune disease is in a nutshell — constant irritation and inflammation that wears away the very fabric of your organs, tissues and cells.
Below, you will find a presentation given by Robyn O’brien who started her career as a food industry analyst and was prompted to dig deeper at the nature of our modern food supply when her own daughter developed strange reactions one morning while eating breakfast. She has been called the “Erin Brockovich” of the food industry and has been praised by the likes of Ted Turner and Dr. Mehmet Oz. Her meticulously detailed research sheds light on policy, the American food system and its financially-driven incentive structure that has allowed additives into the U.S. food supply that have either been banned or labeled from foods in other developed countries, especially the food served to children. Folks, this is serious stuff here and if you are interested in improving your own health and the health of your family, then please take the time to watch the video below.
In her research, she condenses the possible causes of increasing allergies to the following list:
1. The shift from a natural to an industrial environment
2. Excessive exposure to antibiotics, both as prescribed to our children and as consumed through antibiotic-laden meat, milk, and poultry.
3. The rise in pollutants and environmental toxins (perhaps including the fumes and residues from some of the chemical products we use to clean our homes).
4. Our tendency to eat more processed foods loaded with chemical additives and preservatives and to eat far fewer natural whole foods.
Enjoy this eye-opening presentation.
Here is the link to the original article in the medical journal Pediatrics for your reference: (CLICK HERE)
Hi there Folks! Hope everyone is enjoying the beginning of this summer season, as things are warming up rather quickly here in Northeast Georgia. Today’s posts covers some interesting topics that I think you’ll find interesting. First, more research data is supporting that higher fat diets that are within optimal calorie ranges are found to be very healthy, helping people to lose fat faster and showing no signs of vascular damage, which has been the current thinking. Indeed it is commonly thought that dietary fat clogs arteries, and actually, in the context of an appropriate calorie intake, there seems to be advantages over equal calorie higher carbohydrate diets. Those of you that have been reading my posts already know about the advantages of lower carbohydrate diets, particularly in weight loss efforts as it helps decrease hunger which allows you to follow the eating plan LONG TERM. That’s the thing with diets, what helps you in the long term is really what is going to help you overall. Not to mention all the cardiometabolic improvements for folks who have damaged glucose metabolism.
Next, I talk about gallbadder problems and I highlight a recent study that links overconsumption of carbohydrate to gallbladder disease during pregnancy. I get into understanding the hormone factors involved in pregnancy and how that predisposes one to blood sugar disorders and then as the study states, ultimately to gallbladder issue. Find out this and much much more on this recent edition of Embracing Health —– enjoy!
Here’s a fresh new radio post that just aired today on WBCX, where I talked about a few interesting topics you might be interested. First, some new technologies being created through stem cell research that can extend lifespan, and especially restore severe damage to organ systems. Next, I discuss a recent research paper in Nutrition Journal where once again, we see that diets higher in protein, compared to high-fiber higher carbohydrates, are much better to drop body fat and improve blood pressure control. Then, I talk about the recent guidelines that were released last month that help to diagnose Alzheimer’s disease earlier, as it is becoming a serious threat to our economic health structures. Tune in and click below to hear the rebroadcast. Below that, I post the show notes for your reference. Enjoy!
Ricardo
David Kekich of Maximum Life Foundation
Dear Future Centenarian,
Do you remember how much you paid for your first digital watch, pocket calculator or mobile phone? It was probably a whole lot more than you pay for equivalents now, right? In fact, you can barely give away the products you paid so much for then. But you were the first kid on the block to own one, and you paid a premium price.
Extreme life extending technologies won’t be cheap when they are introduced either. And you can bet they’ll be a lot more than you would ever expect to pay for a cell phone. In fact, they most likely may only be affordable to the well off. Sure, prices will drop… and fairly rapidly. But what if you are at the age when you don’t have time to wait?
We’re on the verge of ordering organs grown to replace those that are failing. Stem cell transplants that heal our age-damaged tissues are right around the corner. BioTime’s subsidiary ReCyte Therapeutics, Inc, will utilize its ReCyte™ technology to reverse the developmental aging of human cells. Then it will be used to generate embryonic vascular and blood progenitors from the ReCyte cell lines for therapeutic use in age-related vascular and blood disorders such as coronary disease and heart failure.
I’m thrilled to see this revolutionary stem cell therapy actually approaching the clinic. BioTime’s CEO, Dr. Michael West, can reset the telomere clock of aging in stem cells created from normal adult cells. And all of this is done without the use of embryos or cloning. ReCyte is forthrightly announcing it will cure conditions caused by normal human aging. This is truly revolutionary.
These new “pluripotent” stem cells, made from your own cells, are identical to embryonic stem cells in that they do not age and can be designed to become any cell type in your body. They can also be multiplied and stored indefinitely. Only when these cells have started down the path to their final cell state does the biological clock begin ticking.
ReCyte has announced it will begin banking individuals’ cells this year in preparation for regulatory approval. When ReCyte has enough of these cardiovascular repair cells (and regulatory approval in some legal jurisdiction), they will be given back to patients via transfusion. There will be no immune reaction, because they are your own cells. We know what they will do because you have lots of these cells already, though they are as old as you are. The new cells though, will be only weeks or months old biologically and will displace the older and less effective endothelial precursor cells.
Once in your body, your new rejuvenated stem cells will produce the various cells needed to replace old and damaged heart and vascular cells. These new cells will be vigorous, fully functioning, and youthful. In time, you will have, essentially, a new heart and vascular system – without surgery. The same technology can and will be used to rejuvenate your immune system.
These cells are inside you now. The actual mechanism of action, the replacement of aged cardiovascular cells with new cells, is taking place in your body even as you read this article. If it didn’t work, you would already be dead. BioTime is exploiting natural biological processes, but they will use rejuvenated versions of your own cells.
Until now, four out of ten of us were destined to die from age-related cardiovascular disease. If you’re one of them, your healthy life span will be extended significantly by endothelial precursor therapy. Initially, BioTime’s therapy will be expensive, but not as expensive as the cost of treating an end-stage heart condition. In time, most of the procedure will be roboticized. Costs will plummet.
Coming later, you’ll see artificial cells and engineered bacteria that scour our bodies for harmful levels of waste products in the elderly. Then, you’ll see artificial immune systems, much superior to what you have now, complete rejuvenation when the SENS program matures, and eventually, full-blown nanomedicine. That will give you tools you need to reverse aging, and to keep you from aging. You’ll be able to get everything from drugs, to bioimplants, to cell repair and enhancements, built atom by atom.
Which brings us back to money. As biotechnology advances, the more important money to pay for it becomes. Being self-sufficient and not depending on a broken healthcare system can save your life.
With each passing year, the amount of additional healthy life you could purchase increases. While that increase is comparatively gentle now, and the amount of extra life modest, both will become much larger in ten or twenty years.
Long Life,
David Kekich
Comparison of high protein and high fiber weight-loss diets in women with risk factors for the metabolic syndrome: a randomized trial
Lisa A Te Morenga, Megan T Levers, Sheila M Williams, Rachel C Brown and Jim Mann
For all author emails, please log on.
Nutrition Journal 2011, 10:40 doi:10.1186/1475-2891-10-40
Published: 28 April 2011
Studies have suggested that moderately high protein diets may be more appropriate than conventional low-fat high carbohydrate diets for individuals at risk of developing the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes. However in most such studies sources of dietary carbohydrate may not have been appropriate and protein intakes may have been excessively high. Thus, in a proof-of-concept study we compared two relatively low-fat weight loss diets – one high in protein and the other high in fiber-rich, minimally processed cereals and legumes – to determine whether a relatively high protein diet has the potential to confer greater benefits.
Eighty-three overweight or obese women, 18-65 years, were randomized to either a moderately high protein (30% protein, 40% carbohydrate) diet (HP) or to a high fiber, relatively high carbohydrate (50% carbohydrate, >35g total dietary fiber, 20% protein) diet (HFib) for 8 weeks. Energy intakes were reduced by 2000 – 4000 kJ per day in order to achieve weight loss of between 0.5 and 1 kg per week.
Participants on both diets lost weight (HP: -4.5 kg [95% confidence interval (CI):-3.7, -5.4 kg] and HFib: -3.3 kg [95% CI: -4.2, -2.4 kg]), and reduced total body fat (HP: -4.0 kg [5% CI:-4.6, -3.4 kg] and HFib: -2.5 kg [95% CI: -3.5, -1.6 kg]), and waist circumference (HP: -5.4 cm [95% CI: -6.3, -4.5 cm] and HFib: -4.7 cm [95% CI: -5.8, -3.6 cm]), as well as total and LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, fasting plasma glucose and blood pressure. However participants on HP lost more body weight (-1.3 kg [95% CI: -2.5, -0.1 kg; p=0.039]) and total body fat (-1.3 kg [95% CI: -2.4, -0.1; p=0.029]). Diastolic blood pressure decreased more on HP (-3.7 mm Hg [95% CI: -6.2, -1.1; p=0.005]).
A realistic high protein weight-reducing diet was associated with greater fat loss and lower blood pressure when compared with a high carbohydrate, high fiber diet in high risk overweight and obese women.
Larry King Returns to CNN for Alzheimer’s Special
May 2, 2011 — In his first CNN special since stepping down from his nightly talk show, Larry King discusses Alzheimer’s disease. The 1-hour special, called Unthinkable: The Alzheimer’s Epidemic, aired last night. It looked at who gets the disease and why, the race to find effective treatments, and a possible cure.
King hung up his suspenders in December, ending Larry King Live, the program he hosted for 25 years, but he was back again Sunday speaking with neurologists and celebrities affected by Alzheimer’s.
| Larry King |
King talked to Ronald Petersen, MD, director of the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center. Dr. Petersen treated President Reagan. “If we don’t do something about Alzheimer’s disease right now, Alzheimer’s disease in and of itself may bankrupt the healthcare system,” he warned.
King also spoke with Jeffrey Cummings, MD, director of the Cleveland Clinic Lou Ruvo Center for Brain Health. They discussed how doctors are treating patients and what people can do to diminish their risk.
“It’s a progressive fatal disease,” King said during the special. “The number is expected to hit 16 million by 2050 — that’s an epidemic.”
“It’s an epidemic today,” Harry Johns, president of the Alzheimer’s Association, responded. “5.4 million people have the disease and there are 15 million caregivers. The heartbreak is so real for individuals and families and the cost to the country is expected to be 1.1 trillion by mid-century.”
Johns said the greatest researchers from around the world believe there are remedies for Alzheimer’s disease. “They’ve convinced me it can be done. The real question is when it will be done, not if. But if we don’t make those investments at the federal level in America soon, it will be too late for this boomer generation.”
In Maria Shriver’s first interview since the death of her father, Sargent, from Alzheimer’s, Shriver told King she’s concerned there is no national policy.
“I’m really adamant about finding a cure and getting policies in place to help caretakers. I call it a mind-blowing disease because not only does it blow the mind of the person who gets it, but it blows the mind of everybody who loves that person because it’s forever changing.”
Mind-Blowing
Shriver is the author of the children’s book, What’s Happening to Grandpa. “It’s very challenging to look at your father or your mother and have them not know who you are and have to introduce yourself to them over and over again,” Shriver said during the special. “Even though they look like your parent, they’re not your parent; they become really your child.”
King also spoke with Angie Dickinson whose late sister had Alzheimer’s. “It’s a long good bye, isn’t it?” King said.
“Yes, it is,” Dickinson said. “It was horrible to watch her be afflicted.” Dickinson said she is skeptical there will ever be a cure for Alzheimer’s. “I think they will definitely find something to slow it down,” she noted.
For families in the throes of the disease with someone they love, Dickinson recommended, “Love them and I don’t mean just love them with your soul and your head, but with your arms and your company and your touch and whatever pleasure still might be there for them, and don’t ever let up,” she said.
While promoting the special to HLN’s Dr. Drew Pinsky, King said he asked Dr. Paul Dudley White, the first cardiologist in America, in the first recognized medical specialty, if he were starting again today, what specialty he would choose. Dr. White, who treated President Eisenhower, said he’d choose neurology “because the brain is today what the heart was 50 years ago.”
Dr. Pinsky, also known for his show Celebrity Rehab, said he agrees. “It’s the century of the brain. We just had the decade of the brain and now people are really realizing there’s a lot more.”
The special will re-air Saturday, May 7, at 8 pm ET/PT.
New Alzheimer’s Guidelines Stress Early Diagnosis
Spinal Fluid, Imaging Tests Still Experimental but May Confirm Early Alzheimer’s
By Daniel J. DeNoon
WebMD Health News
Reviewed by Laura J. Martin, MD
April 19, 2011 — Alzheimer’s disease should be diagnosed early, before a person develops severe, late-stage dementia, new guidelines suggest.
It’s been 27 years since guidelines for diagnosing Alzheimer’s disease were laid out. Since 1984, research has shown Alzheimer’s to be a disease that begins decades before dementia appears.
Now panels from the National Institute on Aging and the Alzheimer’s Association have split Alzheimer’s disease into three stages:
Perhaps the biggest change is the way doctors will diagnose Alzheimer’s dementia, says Gary Kennedy, MD. Kennedy, a geriatric psychiatrist who specializes in treating patients with Alzheimer’s disease at Montefiore Medical Center in New York, was not a member of the guideline-writing committees.
“The real new component here is you need not have memory impairment to have Alzheimer’s dementia. They are ratcheting down the dementia criteria,” Kennedy tells WebMD. “If you’re having trouble making plans, have problems adapting to changes in your environment, or have lapses that impair your social involvement with others, you may have Alzheimer’s disease even if your memory is not so bad.”
Slideshow: When a Loved One Has Alzheimer’s
Diagnosis of Early Alzheimer’s Disease
Also new is that the guidelines assume it is possible to identify people with mild cognitive impairment whose worsening symptoms likely reflect an early stage of Alzheimer’s disease.
The criteria for diagnosing mild cognitive impairment due to Alzheimer’s disease are:
“‘Mild’ here means you are not socially impaired, but it does imply you know there is a problem, and your family and friends notice a problem,” Kennedy says.
The problem, of course, is that many people with mild cognitive impairment deny there is a problem.
“So the criteria need refinement,” Kennedy says. “This is more of a provisional diagnosis. That is why the guidelines put an emphasis on biomarkers — signposts that dementia may be down the road.”
Biomarkers for Alzheimer’s Disease
Biomarkers are tests that detect a disease process. Examples are tests of cholesterol levels to predict heart disease risk or blood sugar tests to predict diabetes.
Biomarkers are being developed for Alzheimer’s disease, but the guidelines stress that they are not yet ready for clinical use except in certain well-defined situations.
There are several Alzheimer’s biomarkers being explored, but two basic types are in the most advanced stages of development:
The new guidelines stress that none of these tests have been fully validated and that there are no cutoff levels that clearly distinguish normal people from those who have Alzheimer’s.
Nevertheless, the guidelines suggest that for some patients with mild cognitive impairment suggestive of Alzheimer’s disease, biomarker tests “would affect levels of certainty in the diagnosis.”
Treatment for Alzheimer’s Disease
There’s no cure for Alzheimer’s disease, so why the emphasis on early detection? Kennedy says the earlier you detect possible Alzheimer’s, the more you can do about it.
“Ten years ago we said there was no treatment for Alzheimer’s. That isn’t true now,” he says. “We can’t cure it, but just like diabetes, we can delay the illness and disability associated with it. I counsel patients to be aggressive about diet and exercise, to take the medications they need for other conditions, and to stay intellectually engaged.”
The new Alzheimer’s guidelines appear in the April 19 online issue of Alzheimer’s & Dementia: The Journal of the Alzheimer’s Association.